Eco-Brutalism: A Harmonious Dichotomy
The design style has risen in popularity on the internet in the past few years, revered for its stark juxtaposition and post-apocalyptic feel. There’s something striking about a structure that has no intention of feeling anything but man-made engulfed in vines, as though nature is reclaiming it.
Brutalism at its core is based on necessity and utilitarianism, function triumphs over opulent design. The post-war origin led to the desire for durable, no frills structures that embrace harsh lines, geometric shape, and concrete. Brutalism is divisive and regarded by some as cold and soulless, but Brutalism enjoyers welcome the rejection of ostentation.
Biophilic design at its core focuses on ecology, humans interacting with nature in built environments, and sustainability– both for mental wellbeing and practical energy conservation. The concept goes beyond peppering in the occasional plant and calling it a day, but encourages plant design to be at the forefront of a structure’s inception.
The two concepts, on a surface level, are the antithesis of one another, but Eco-Brutalism merges utilitarianism and ecology in a harmonious dichotomy. Greenery softens the bare concrete and metal work, creating a beautifully intriguing structure. When done effectively, it may help to offset the environmental impacts of a concrete structure and transform it into an oasis in which humans can thrive– at least, that’s the hope.